Regional Analysis · Urban · March 2026
Peter Tumbas
Peter TumbasBerkshire Hathaway HomeServices New England Properties · CT RES.0836133
March 26, 2026 · 12 min read

Rome vs. Florence —
Two Italian Pied-à-Terre Markets Compared for Americans

Editorial intelligence only. This article does not constitute tax, legal, or investment advice. Engage qualified Italian and US professionals before any property or tax decision. US citizens remain subject to all IRS reporting obligations regardless of any foreign elections made.

Rome and Florence appear in the same breath in most American buyer shortlists. They have meaningfully different property market characteristics. The choice between them should be driven by how you plan to use the property, not by which city appears more romantic in theory.

Rome — The Case For

Rome is larger, more liquid, and has a broader supply of historic centre apartments at varying price points. Entry for a one-bedroom in the Centro Storico runs €450,000–€700,000. Quality two-bedroom units in Trastevere or Prati: €700,000–€1.5M. Rome has a functioning year-round short-term rental market (subject to evolving local regulations) and a larger expat community providing English-language services. The city does not shut down in August the way Florence does, and its transport infrastructure is more functional for a primary residence use case.

Florence — The Case For

Florence has a smaller historic centre, tighter supply, and a higher price per square metre in premier addresses — Centro Storico properties run €6,000–€10,000/sqm for renovated palazzo apartments. The Oltrarno district (south bank of the Arno) is increasingly the neighbourhood serious buyers prefer for actual habitation: authentic artisan character, somewhat lower prices than Centro, and a growing English-language infrastructure. Florence is also within a shorter drive of the Tuscan countryside market, which matters for buyers combining urban and rural acquisition strategies.

Short-Term Rental Considerations

Florence has enacted some of the most restrictive short-term rental regulations in Italy, including specific limitations in the Centro Storico. Rome's regulatory framework is less restrictive but evolving. Before any purchase where rental income is part of the business case, confirm the current local ordinance with your Italian attorney for the specific address you are considering. This is not a stable regulatory picture.

Transaction Specifics

Both cities have high concentrations of historic buildings with heritage (vincolo) classifications that restrict renovation scope and require Soprintendenza approval for changes to exterior appearance, structural elements, and in some cases interior finishes. Due diligence on the specific classification of any property you are considering must be completed before the compromesso.

The Honest Framing

The most coherent buyer thesis for both Rome and Florence is the pied-à-terre: a property owned primarily for personal use, with occasional short-term rental to offset carrying costs, in a market where the property has cultural significance and long-term capital preservation characteristics. Neither city suits buyers primarily motivated by yield or tax efficiency — for those profiles, Sicily and Como respectively offer better structures.

Safe Havens for Americans — Global Markets

Safe Havens HQ ↗Dubai ↗Algarve ↗Phuket ↗Italia · You are here